Tag Archives: Iran

Iran says it recorded video of US aircraft carrier


TEHRAN, Iran (AP) — An Iranian surveillance plane has recorded video and photographed a U.S. aircraft carrier during Iran’s ongoing navy drill near a strategic waterway in the Persian Gulf, the official IRNA news agency reported on Thursday.

The report did not provide details and it was unclear what information the Iranian military could glean from such footage. But the announcement is an indication Iran is seeking to cast its navy as having a powerful role in the region’s waters.

IRNA quoted Iran’s navy chief, Adm. Habibollah Sayyari, as saying the action shows that Iran has “control over the moves by foreign forces” in the area where Tehran is holding a 10-day military exercise.

“An Iranian vessel and surveillance plane have tracked, filmed and photographed a U.S. aircraft carrier as it was entering the Gulf of Oman from the Persian Gulf,” Sayyari said.

He added that the “foreign fleet will be warned by Iranian forces if it enters the area of the drill.”

State TV showed what appeared to be the reported video, but it was not possible to make out the details of the carrier because the footage was filmed from far away.

The Iranian exercise is taking place in international waters near the Strait of Hormuz — the passageway for one-sixth of the world’s oil supply.

Beyond it lie vast bodies of water, including the Arabian Sea and the Gulf of Aden. The U.S. Navy’s Bahrain-based 5th Fleet is also active in the area, as are warships of several other countries that patrol for pirates there.

Lt. Rebecca Rebarich, a spokeswoman for the U.S. 5th Fleet, said the aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis and guided-missile cruiser USS Mobile Bay headed out from the Gulf and through the Strait of Hormuz on Tuesday, after a visit to Dubai’s Jebel Ali port.

She described the passage through the strait as “a pre-planned, routine transit” for the carrier, which is providing air support from the north Arabian Sea to troops in Afghanistan.

Rebarich did not directly address Iranian claims of possessing the reported footage but said the 5th Fleet’s “interaction with the regular Iranian Navy continues to be within the standards of maritime practice, well known, routine and professional.”

Thursday’s report follows U.S. warnings over Iranian threats to choke off traffic through the Strait of Hormuz if Washington imposes sanctions targeting Iran’s crude exports. On Wednesday, Rebarich said the Navy was “always ready to counter malevolent actions to ensure freedom of navigation.”

Gen. Hossein Salami, the acting commander of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard rejected the warning.

“The U.S. is not in a position” to affect Iran’s decisions, Salami told the semi-official Fars news agency Thursday. “Iran does not ask permission to implement its own defensive strategies.”


U.S. Navy won’t tolerate ‘disruption’ through Strait of Hormuz


(CNN) — The U.S. Navy said Iran‘s threat to block the strategically and economically important Strait of Hormuz is unacceptable.

“The free flow of goods and services through the Strait of Hormuz is vital to regional and global prosperity,” Navy 5th Fleet in Bahrain spokeswoman Cmdr. Amy Derrick Frost told reporters on Wednesday.

“Anyone who threatens to disrupt freedom of navigation in an international strait is clearly outside the community of nations; any disruption will not be tolerated.

Iran’s vice president has warned that the country could block the strait if sanctions are imposed on its exports of crude oil. France, Britain and Germany have proposed sanctions to punish Iran’s lack of cooperation on its nuclear program.

The 5th Fleet is based in Bahrain, and Frost noted that the Navy “maintains a robust presence in the region to deter or counter destabilizing activities.”

“We conduct maritime security operations under international maritime conventions to ensure security and safety in international waters for all commercial shipping to operate freely while transiting the region,” she said.

Asked whether the fleet would be able to keep the strait open if Iran moved to close it, she said, “The U.S. Navy is a flexible, multi-capable force committed to regional security and stability, always ready to counter malevolent actions to ensure freedom of navigation.”

Frost was also asked whether keeping the strait open is part of the fleet’s mandate.

She said it is “committed to protecting maritime freedoms that are the basis for global prosperity. This is one of the main reasons our military forces operate in the region.

“The U.S. Navy, along with our coalition and regional partners, operates under international maritime conventions to maintain a constant state of high vigilance in order to ensure the continued, safe flow of maritime traffic in waterways critical to global commerce.”

The French Foreign Ministry stressed that the waterway is an international strait.

“In consequence, all ships, whatever their flag, enjoy the right of passage in transit, in accordance with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, adopted in 1982, and with the customary international maritime law,” the ministry said.

Iran is holding a 10-day military exercise in an area from the eastern part of the strait out into the Arabian Sea. Western diplomats describe the maneuvers as further evidence of Iran’s volatile behavior.


IRAN THREATENS TO CLOSE THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ


English: Map of Strait of Hormuz Español: Mapa...

Image via Wikipedia

(Reuters) – Iranthreatened on Tuesday to stop the flow of oil through the Strait of Hormuz if foreign sanctions were imposed on its crude exports over its nuclear ambitions, a move that could trigger military conflict with economies dependent on Gulf oil.

Western tensions with Iran have increased since a November 8 report by the U.N. nuclear watchdog saying Tehran appears to have worked on designing an atomic bomb and may still be pursuing research to that end. Iran strongly denies this and says it is developing nuclear energy for peaceful purposes.

Iran has defiantly expanded nuclear activity despite four rounds of U.N. sanctions meted out since 2006 over its refusal to suspend sensitive uranium enrichment and open up to U.N. nuclear inspectors and investigators.

Many diplomats and analysts believe only sanctions targeting Iran’s lifeblood oil sector might be painful enough to make it change course, but Russia and China – big trade partners of Tehran – have blocked such a move at the United Nations.

Iran’s warning on Tuesday came three weeks after EU foreign ministers decided to tighten sanctions over the U.N. watchdog report and laid out plans for a possible embargo of oil from the world’s No. 5 crude exporter.

“If they (the West) impose sanctions on Iran’s oil exports, then even one drop of oil cannot flow from the Strait of Hormuz,” the official Iranian news agency IRNA quoted Iran’s First Vice President Mohammad Reza Rahimi as saying.

Rahimi’s remarks coincided with a 10-day Iranian naval exercise in the Strait and nearby waters, a show of military force that began on Saturday and coincides with the heightened Western pressure on Tehran.

“Our enemies will give up on their plots against Iran only if we give them a firm and strong lesson,” Rahimi said.

JANUARY MEETING

EU ministers said on December 1 that a decision on further sanctions would be taken no later than their January meeting but left open the idea of an embargo on Iranian oil.

Countries in the 27-member European Union take 450,000 barrels per day of Iranian oil, about 18 percent of the Islamic Republic’s exports, much of which go to China and India. EU officials declined to comment on Tuesday.

About a third of all sea-borne oil was shipped through the Strait of Hormuz in 2009, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), and U.S. warships patrol the area to ensure safe passage.

Most of the crude exported from Saudi Arabia, Iran, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Iraq – together with nearly all the liquefied natural gas from lead exporter Qatar – must slip through the Strait of Hormuz, a 4-mile wide shipping channel between Oman and Iran.

Iran has also hinted it could hit Israel and U.S. interests in the Gulf in response to any military strike on its nuclear installations – a last resort option hinted at by Washington and the Jewish state.

However, some analysts say Iran would think hard about sealing off the Strait since it could suffer just as much economically as Western crude importers, and could kindle war with militarily superior big powers.

“To me, if Iran did that it would be a suicidal act by the regime. Even its friends would be its enemies,” said Phil Flynn, analyst at PFG Best Research in Chicago.

SAUDI REPLACEMENT?

Industry sources said on Tuesday No. 1 oil exporter Saudi Arabia and other Gulf OPEC states were ready to replace Iranian oil if further sanctions halt Iranian crude exports to Europe.

Iranian Oil Minister Rostam Qasemi had said that Saudi Arabia had promised not to replace Iranian crude if sanctions were imposed.

“No promise was made to Iran, its very unlikely that Saudi Arabia would not fill a demand gap if sanctions are placed,” an industry source familiar with the matter said.

Gulf delegates from the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) said an Iranian threat to close the Strait of Hormuz would harm Tehran as well as the major regional producers that also use the world’s most vital oil export channel.

Oil prices spiked on Tuesday, fuelled by fears of supply disruptions and Iranian naval exercises in a crucial oil shipping route, with gains capped by simmering euro zone debt concerns.

Crude oil futures jumped nearly a dollar to over $109 a barrel after the Iranian threat, but a Gulf OPEC delegate said the effect could be temporary. “For now, any move in the oil price is short-term, as I don’t see Iran actually going ahead with the threat,” the delegate told Reuters.

The industry source said that in the case of EU sanctions, Iran would most likely export more of its crude to Asia, while Gulf states would divert their exports to Europe to fill the gap until the market is balanced again.

A prominent analyst said that if Iran did manage to shut down the Strait of Hormuz, the ensuing spike in oil prices could wreck the global economy, so the United States was likely to intervene to foil such a blockade in the first place.

“First, the U.S. will probably not allow Iran to close the Strait. That’s a major economic thoroughfare and not just for oil. You shut that Strait and we are talking a major hit on many Middle East economies,” said Carl Larry, president of Oil Outlooks in New York.

“Second, there is no way that the Saudis (alone) have enough oil or quality of oil to replace Iranian crude. Figure Saudi spare capacity is 2 to 4 million at best. Of that spare, about 1-2 million is real oil that is comparable out of Iran. Lose Iran, lose 3.5 million barrels per day of imports. No way.”

French President Nicolas Sarkozy proposed hitting Iran with an oil embargo and won support from Britain, but resistance to the idea persists within and outside the European Union.

An import ban might raise global oil prices during hard economic times and debt-strapped Greece has been relying on attractively financed Iranian oil.

Iran’s seaborne trade is already suffering from existing trade sanctions, with shipping companies scaling down or pulling out as the Islamic Republic faces more hurdles in transporting its oil.

(Additional reporting by Parisa Hafezi in Tehran, Dmitry Zhdannikov in London, Robert Gibbons and Janet McGurty in New York, Amena Bakr in Dubai; Writing by Mark Heinrich; Editing by Jon Boyle and Alison Williams)


NDAA BILL AIMS TO SUPPRESS INTERNET FREEDOMS


NDAA Bll Aims To suppress Internet Freedoms

The bill Contains language that would effectively allow pentagon to wage cyber war.With the

authority to label certain people as belligerent or as terrorist, it will no doubt be tested in

the realm of web journalism.The bill also posses threat to Occupy Wall Street protesters as well

as Tea Party activist and  the development of any hardline third party, or ultra conservative or

liberal third party as the vague nature of the language will easily allow for them to classified

belligerent or in support of terrorist.

to demonstrate the direction they intend to go, heres an excerpt from the bill”Congress affirms

that the Department of Defense has the capability, and upon direction by the President may

conduct offensive operations in cyberspace to defend our Nation, Allies and interests, subject

to (1) the policy principles and legal regimes that the Department follows for kinetic

capabilities, including the law of armed conflict; and (2) the War Powers Resolution.”

662 billion dollars is allocated towards military operations funding, including Iraq, Afghanistan

and more likely Syria and eventually Iran.But a fair amount of language about detention of

citizens deemed supportive to terrorist or belligerent is included.There is also some language

referencing sanction protocol in relation to Iran.

It seems that the pentagon is worried about cyber threats with the implementation of the new

smart grid.However, the Pentagon believes that “non-state actors increasingly threaten to

penetrate and disrupt DOD networks and systems.” To address this cyber threat, the Pentagon

released a plan declaring the Internet a “domain of war,” claiming how hostile groups “are

working to exploit DOD unclassified and classified networks, and some foreign intelligence

organizations have already acquired the capacity to disrupt elements of DOD’s information

infrastructure.”

“The U.S. is vulnerable to sabotage in defense, power, telecommunications, banking,” said Sami

Saydjari, a former Pentagon cyber expert. “An attack on any one of those essential

infrastructures could be as damaging as any kinetic attack on U.S. soil.”

“If you shut down our power grid, maybe we will put a missile down one of your smokestacks,”

said one Pentagon official, prior to releasing its cybersecurity plan.

In other words, the Pentagon is afraid that with the Internet’s capability to disseminate

information instantly, the spread of information or ideas “not consistent with U.S. government

themes and messages” could be too powerful and dangerous to national security


ATTACK ON RUSSIAN DIPLOMAT IN QATAR: DIPLOMATIC POUCH CONTAINED INFORMATION THAT US PLANS A BIOLOGICAL ATTACK IF MIDDLE EAST GOES NUCLEAR


A bulletin issued to Prime Minister Putin and President Medvedev states that President Hu has “agreed in principal” that the only way to stop the West’s aggression led by the US is through “direct and immediate military action” and that the Chinese leader has ordered his Naval Forces to “prepare for warfare”
Its seems also that the attack on the high ranking Russian Diplomats in Qutar was to retrieve the diplomatic pouches that they were carrying.The bulletin released by the Russian Defense Minister and some other reports say that the extreme measures to retrieve these pouches was based on intel that the Syrian Embassy was sending back reports that the US was inserting the same Al Qaida insurgents used to topple the libyan Government. Further evidence in these pouches said the bulletin is that the United states was preparing a “Final Plan” should nuclear war break out in the Middle East, in which they would release a 5X mutated strain of the Avian bird flu.A detail revealed just prior to the diplomatic incident by a Dutch Virologist named Ron Fouchier of Erasmus Medical Center in the Netherlands.The bulletin also said that should The United States begin an attack utilizing this virus delivery would be via its RQ-170 Sentinel Drone. The information published in this bulletin was a result of information gathered by Russian analyst and information received from the examination of the drone shot down earlier in Iran.
the assessment of the ever escalating situation in the middle east paints a very somber picture. The first use of a virus by the US came in 1918 when they released a Spanish flu variant at the end of World War 1 which killed an estimated 50 to 100 million people.
The KGB has always asserted that that flu was “engineered”
The global agenda unfolding seems to be a result of the economic woes of the world at the moment with 100-1000 trillion dollars worth of debt steadily collapsing the world into chaos.Sadly, these details are being kept from the American Public and now we sit on the doorstep of financial stone age and nuclear holocaust at the exact same time.


US-NATO Soldiers Arrive & Begin Operations on the Jordan-Syria Border What This Means


 

Seal of the C.I.A. - Central Intelligence Agen...

Image via Wikipedia

Coat of arms of Syria -- the "Hawk of Qur...
Image via Wikipedia

http://nwotruth.com/breaking-us-troops-deploying-on-jordan-syria-border-video/

 http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2011/12/11/bfp-exclusive-developing-story-hundreds-of-us-nato-soldiers-arrive-begin-operations-on-the-jordan-syria-border/#respond

Soldiers who speak languages other than Arabic were seen during the past two days in certain areas moving back and forth in military vehicles between the King Hussein Air Base of al-Mafraq (10 km from the Syrian border), and the vicinity of Jordanian villages adjacent to the Syrian border, such as village Albaej (5 km from the border), the area around the dam of Sarhan, the villages of Zubaydiah and al-Nahdah adjacent to the Syrian border.
Another report received from a source in Amman identified an additional US-NATO Command Center in “al-Houshah,’ a village near Mafraq

In the Sixties A defected Major from Syria fled to Jordan with a number of officers after a failed coup. The above mentioned air base of Al-Mafraq was a center for the resistance that was undoubtedly CIA backed and would no doubt be a prime area for a buildup of another entry operation.

I believe that any action in Syria would have to be somewhat covert due to the fact that China and Russia are both speaking against a NATO humanitarian effort and are exercising their veto capabilities.This is a move that will have repercussions it will end up being a serious conflict and information such as this will no doubt be kept quiet.

As an example of the type of bog down that is in store for a Syrian effort take a look at some statements made by Iran(also Russian and China backed)in August:
Iran Warns NATO against Syria Intervention
Iran warned NATO on Sunday against intervention in Syria, saying if NATO enters Syria, it would be bogged down in a “quagmire.”

Iran’s Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi reiterated its support for Syria, but added that Syrian President Bashar Assad should answer the “legitimate demands” of his people.

Salehi said a political vacuum in Syria would lead to an unprecedented regional crisis, and blamed protests and killings on “outside agitators” [ISNA, 28 August].

If you are awake to the Globalist Plan you know doubt see that this fits into their take over plan they are at the cusp og consolidating power and only a few power house country’s stand in the way..RESOURCES RESOURCES RESOURCES is what it boils down to dont be fooled by the rhetoric..